One could argue that this is the most important part of the website, especially with websites that are monetarily or politically driven.

Q. What is the purpose of this website? It is to have a rational discussion about the potential pitfalls that we see vegans, and their progeny, suffer. I believe humanity will be improved with fewer vegans, as it will be happier, healthier and have a more nuanced perspective on farming and animals.

Q. Have I tried being vegan? Yes, I have. For me it was not sustainable. I do not like lentils or various fake meat products, and they are simply devoid of nutrition if we compare them to meat. I deem it unlikely that the optimal way of eating would be a diet that has not been possible in any other time of humankind without resulting in brain damage and death, as we did not have synthetic vitamins before.

Q. What about the animals? I believe the animals are better off with fewer vegans. Not only is the vegan argument simply based on anthropomorphizing animals and projecting their false beliefs and ideas onto them, but we simply cannot know whether animals would prefer non-existence over a short but sometimes trying life. Do we think that there are no children with various deadly illnesses who still prefer to have their short life over never being born at all? Why would it be different?

Q. How will you go about proving your belief? The first post will contain the general outline of the website, and in what order things will be posted. I will first go through my view of the world, how I think and how I try to disseminate truthful information in this age of lies and half-truths. I will then scour the scientific literature for various scientific studies that have looked at veganism, or often vegetarianism (there are few vegan studies), and then summarize the various data points that prove my position. We will start with what I believe are the weakest arguments and work through them until we get to the strongest.